The recent decision by several North American radio stations to ban the
iconic Christmas song, “Baby, it’s Cold Outside”, written by Frank Loesser in
1944, because of a perceived notion that the lyrics depict a secret agenda of date
rape is, in my opinion, long overdue.
A song, written 74 years ago, under the
pretense of flirty banter between a man and a woman trying to find a way to
have some extra smooch time under the mistletoe and avoid the social stigma of
premarital sex, has finally been given the criminal label it deserves. It is my
hope that now other Christmas classics will be given the same scrutiny.
This cheating mother, as portrayed by Norman Rockwell, has been a detriment to the nuclear family model. |
Countless times I have had to cover my children’s ears when “I Saw
Mommy Kissing Santa Claus” was played over the sound system at the mall. It is
outrageous that a song, so clearly glorifying adultery, has been given a
white-gloved thumbs up all these years.
And, how do I even begin with the scandalous meaning behind the
song, “Santa, Baby”. First of all, she wants a fur coat. A fur! And the level
of raunchy flirtation and outright sexual innuendo she makes in order to
bribe Santa to fulfill her wish list makes me blush.
Poor Rudolph clearly had a problem with the white stuff. |
“Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer”? This ain’t no song about a
misfit discovering a secret talent and saving Christmas. Red nose? Banned from
participating in all the games? Yeah, obviously little Rudy sniffs a
little too much of the white stuff in the reindeer stables and has the shiny nose to
prove it.
And where do I even begin with the religious ones trying to force
their beliefs on us about some baby named Jesus, when the true meaning of
Christmas comes down to gifts, gifts and gifts! I am not referring to the three special gifts given to this Jesus character by some wandering wise men. I mean the big, flashy and expensive stuff that measures one's love for another. Clearly.
Or maybe, just maybe, the decision makers at these radio stations have hearts which are two-sizes too small. Maybe they feel pandering to a few taking
the #metoo movement in a radically over- reactive state is necessary.
Let’s be real here for a moment. Social rules and expectations
were dramatically different in 1944. Especially for women. And this song
was sold to MGM to be used in the movie, Neptune’s Daughter, which was a romantic comedy. Analyzing the song based entirely on the lyrics without
incorporating the visual of the production is misleading. In fact, in the movie there are two renditions of the song- one featuring actors Ricardo Montalban and Esther Williams and then the roles reverse and Betty Garrant is trying to convince Red Skelton that, baby, it's cold outside!
Besides the symbolic re-messaging of a classic and academy
award winning song, there is another aspect of this decision that is truly a
warning for anyone who enjoys being able to have the freedom to read, listen or
watch what he/she chooses. The social media spin of the ridiculousness of this
decision is overshadowing what truly happened.
"Baby, it's Cold Outside" was featured in the MGM romantic comedy, Neptune's Daughter. |
Several stations have decided to remove the song from their playlists without allowing the public
the freedom to decide for themselves whether to sing along or turn the tune down if offended by the lyrics.These stations played "big brother" and banned a song from it’s entire listener-ship.
Banning a song, after nearly 80 years of play, because now a few
people believe it is a song about date rape should not be accepted. It does not
matter if you believe a drink was roofied or whether the couple was enjoying
some rum in eggnog. This banning can lead to banning anything in our society
people do not agree with and decisions being made by a few can take away the
freedoms and consciousness of an entire society. Today it is lyrics. Tomorrow
it will be books. And where does it go from there?
The fear-mongering is laughable in this particular case, but that
is how it begins. It is a comical situation and the memes have already been popping up. But, take out the humour for a moment and think about how easily this decision was made and enforced.
We have the right to listen to what we want to. We have the right
to read what we want to. We have the right to watch movies and television shows
and visit art galleries and museums and enjoy the work of all artists. Our
opinions or perceptions will not always agree, but that is the point of freedom.
I can choose not to add a book I dislike to my personal shelf, but the public
library should not be able to ban a book based on the librarian’s perceptions.
I happened to catch about the last half of the movie, National
Lampoon’s Vacation on the weekend. It was interesting to watch it on two
levels. The first was an adult versus child mode. I found myself appreciating a
lot of the humour and scenes that went way over my head in my youth.
The other was a 2018 versus mid-nineteen eighties mode. I still
laughed and enjoyed the movie- however some of my laughter felt tainted with
guilt. There are several jokes and scenes that would not be put in a movie
today because of how sensitive our culture has become with not offending
anyone. But that is basing it on society of today- not how society was in 1983.
Were there some offensive jokes? Yes. Should it be banned? NO! Should we have
the choice to decide to view it or not? Absolutely.
In 1944 a woman’s entire reputation and life could literally be
ruined with a simple rumour of un-ladylike behaviour- such as staying,
unchaperoned, in an unmarried man’s apartment late at night.
This song, as
clearly shown in the movie, is a tongue-in-cheek response to societal
expectations.
When I was about ten-years-old, I remember one Christmas at
my Nanny and Grampy’s house. Grampy playfully grabbed a hold of Nanny as she
walked by and he hugged her tight and they snuggled by their fireplace for a
moment. He looked at her lovingly and said, “baby, it’s cold outside” and her
eyes lit up and she laughed shyly as she looked around the room to see if
anyone had overheard him. I remember feeling so happy in that moment. I
remember thinking they were silly and loving and, not knowing about the movie at that time, I literally thought it was about snuggling and being warm. I do, in retrospect, believe there is a hidden
meaning to the song.
Simply: let’s meet under the mistletoe, darling.
And let’s
leave it at that.
Watch the actual scene from Neptune's Daughter depicting "Baby, it's Cold Outside" here
.Neptune's Daughter
6 comments:
Thank you .I love how you have worded this. Let's all have the chance to make our own decisions.
It is unfair that others are trying to make everyone else's decisions
Kim
Thank you Kim! My feelings exactly :)
Well done, Brandy. Merry Christmas to you, Darren, and all the kids. -Fawn (Hibbs)
There are thousands of old holiday songs that don’t get air play for one reason or another. Taking a tune out of rotation isn’t ‘censorship.’ If it is, every Top 40 chart is censoring musicians every week when they drop the less popular songs.
Let’s get the rate of sexual assault against women down to less than 1 in 5, and then I’ll be interested in the historical context behind a holiday song about a dude repeatedly asking a woman to screw him. Until then, I’m gonna put it in the ‘anachronisms I don’t need anymore’ bin where I put movies with actors in black face and comedy routines about Jews told in a German accent prior to ww2.
Why Michael! Thank you for your comment. Just wanted to clear something up.
The definition of CENSORSHIP IS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security.
So, while I completely agree that "taking a tune out of rotation isn't censorship" that is not what happened with this song.
Every Top 40 station creating a new play list is NOT censoring those songs; they are simply, as you said, moving the less popular ones out of steady rotation to make room for the new hits and maintain relevancy. That is simply staying on top of trends. And, as you know, with radio stations, even if a song IS taken off a playlist, there are opportunities to call and request any song and it will be played during segments.
CENSORSHIP is when a station takes a song OFF the air as noted above, and it is what happened in this situation. It was not just removed from rotation. It will not be played if requested on these stations.
I appreciate your concern over the sexual assault rates against woman.
I am not sure where you live, but according to my stats from SACHA the numbers are a big larger than yours.
In Canada 1 in 3 women will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. Please check the facts here: http://sacha.ca/resources/statistics
Oh, and it seems as though you feel my attitude about "a dude repeatedly asking a woman to screw him" is blase as I tried to explain the "historical context" of the song.
Again, just an unwarranted conclusion....if you read this feature of mine https://brandywrites.blogspot.com/2016/12/get-over-it-it-was-only-20-minutes-june.html
I believe you would understand that I am clearly against sexual assault. Which is why this censorship about a song taken out of context frustrated me so much.
Imagine if people would stop carrying on like fools in the name of "protecting women" from rape culture and actually focused attention to the thousands of woman, children and men sexually assaulted every day?
The pure ridiculousness of this sensational censorship has actually tarnished the #metoo movement.
I respect your interpretation of the song. Don't agree with it, but I've done extensive research and analysis of the lyrics. And not really sure where you are going with the last statement, but again...thanks for commenting!
Merry Christmas to you as well, Hibbs! Thanks for reading :)
Post a Comment